In praise of Photo Mechanic

Every software package has its fans, its designers and its detractors. If we all loved the same system then there would be no choice. I wanted to blog about Photo Mechanic and to say how much I like it. That isn’t to say that the others are rubbish – that would childish and purile – just that I find this one application suits me and what I do extremely well. So what is Photo Mechanic? I thought that the description on the company’s own website was hard to beat:

Photo Mechanic is a standalone image browser and workflow accelerator that lets you view your digital photos with convenience and speed. Photo Mechanic displays your “thumbnails” in a familiar “contact sheet” display window. Photo Mechanic helps you find the best photo amongst several similar shots in a preview display that lets you flip through a group of selected photos at high resolution.

Photo Mechanic’s super fast browsing enables you to quickly compare multiple images and select the best ones from a sequence. Its powerful batch processing, full support for image variables, IPTC and Exif metadata, make it the perfect tool for any digital photographer.

Before this becomes an advert and a love-in, there are a few tiny issues with the current (4.6.8) version that I’d love to get sorted. The trouble is that we quickly revert to the “love-in” because the team at Camerabits who design, code and sell Photo Mechanic are second-to-none when it comes to listening to the views, issues and suggestions of their customers. Got a problem? Email Camerabits and nine times out of ten they sort it the same day and the other one out of ten times sees a resolution in the next upgrade.

Screen grab of a Photo Mechanic "contact sheet" window.

Anyway, what do I use it for? Photo Mechanic is the package that I use to import RAW images from my memory cards, edit out the bad pictures, IPTC caption, batch rename, edit again and then send the selected RAW files to my RAW converter of choice (which happens to be ACR in Photoshop CS5.5 but that isn’t important right now). Once the files are converted there they are right back in Photo Mechanic where I can save them to a separate folder, create HTML web galleries, burn discs, FTP or email images to clients or pretty much whatever I might need to do with photographs.

I can hear people saying that there are plenty of packages that can do all or some of the above and even ones that remove the need for a separate RAW converter – all true, but that misses the point. I want my workflow to be fast, repeatable, adaptable and generally hassle free. I want to rely on the trackpad or the mouse as little as possible and have a good, strong set of keyboard shortcuts instead. Bingo – that’s what I get from Photo Mechanic.

In an earlier post I talked about how teaching helps you to get your own practice right and this is very true with using software. If I had to work without Photo Mechanic tomorrow I have a good knowledge of Apple’s Aperture and a very good knowledge of Lightroom and I would never try to dissuade anyone from using those packages. Having had to buy and learn other software has made me appreciate what I have.

The Camerabits website says that version 5 of the software is due in the early part of 2012 and that there will be a separate but interconnected cataloguing application available too. That’s two things from my wish list sorted out – all we need now is a version of Photo Mechanic for the Apple iOS and that would be another thing ticked off that list.


  1. Well, this story about PM5 is running now for years (3-4 years)! Still no show, even no screenshots. I think this is a never ending story and Kirk is writing his answers like “…we are working on it…” and ” ….no, maybe in a couple of month’s…”. etc.
    Read my lips, there will be never ever a PM catalog edition, it’s just internet blahblah *******, to fill the pages.


    1. As a general rule I mark anonymous comments as ‘spam’ – especially those whose language I disapprove of. On this occasion I wanted to respond and say that I hope that you are wrong and that there is no rush because Photo Mechanic 4.6x is very good indeed. From what I am told they have demonstrated it to a few people as well as showing it at an exhibition in late 2011. What do you want? The reputation of a gloriously useful tool to be spoiled by rushing it to market too quickly or for Kirk and the team to get it right so that hard working photographers don’t end up as unwitting beta testers?


  2. OK, you only would like to hear the nice comments. Well excellent article!
    I use to use anonymous comments due to real ‘spam’, otherwise my mailbox will fillup with, well you mark as *******.
    BTW looking at the Adobe Lightroom approach: a few month’s beta testing for people who want to, after that a final release. No debate for years on the web. That’s what I wanted to point out. And forgive me I’m not a native english speaker, feel free and give it a try to reply i.e. in dutch… Have a nice day!


    1. I think that Adobe’s resources are greater than those of Camera Bits. I think that they are very different applications and my Dutch, well it doesn’t exist!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.